Why FEUrea beats FENa
Loop diuretics (like Furosemide/Lasix) work by blocking sodium reabsorption in the Loop of Henle. This artificially doubles or triples the amount of sodium in the urine, making FENa tests uselessly high (> 2%).
However, urea reabsorption primarily happens in the Proximal Tubule, which diuretics generally do not affect. This makes FEUrea a "clean" window into the kidney's intent—is it trying to save water (Prerenal) or is it too damaged to function (Intrinsic)?
Interpreting the Result
< 35% (Prerenal)
The kidney is functioning correctly. It is sensing low volume (dehydration) and actively reabsorbing urea along with water. The treatment is typically IV fluids.
> 50% (Intrinsic / ATN)
The proximal tubules are damaged or necrotic. They cannot reabsorb urea even if the body is dehydrated. This indicates ATN regardless of diuretic use.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FEUrea more accurate than FENa?
Can I use FEUrea for patients with sepsis?
What if the result is between 35% and 50%?
Does a high BUN affect the calculation?
Why is the cutoff 35% and not 1% like FENa?
References
- Carvounis CP, et al. (2002). Significance of fractional excretion of urea in the differential diagnosis of acute renal failure. Kidney International.
- Medscape. Fractional Excretion of Urea Analysis.
- Renal Fellow Network. FENa vs FEUrea: The Debate.
- National Institutes of Health (NIH). Urea Nitrogen Handling in AKI.
Tools & Data Verified by the EverydayCalculators Medical Research Team.
Last updated: January 2026.